We stress-test what others have built.
Independent expert red-teaming of LLMs, agents, and AI systems — before they ship, before they scale, before the regulator calls. Adversarial prompts, jailbreak attempts, tool-misuse scenarios, prompt-injection chains, edge-case planning. We find the failures you’d rather find than your customers find. Every report signed and dated.
Methodology
/ 4 phasesScope + threat model
We agree which systems are in scope, which failure modes matter most, what access we need, and what we’re not allowed to touch. Independence clauses get drafted with your legal counsel before anyone runs a prompt.
Adversarial campaign
Adversarial prompts, jailbreak attempts, prompt-injection chains, tool-misuse scenarios, edge-case planning, and grounded-QA stress tests. Code review, prompt review, eval review, log review where in scope. Every finding is referenced to a primary source.
Test + report
We run our own evaluation suite against the system as a third party. The report draft goes through internal review by a red-team lead who is not on the engagement.
Sign-off + submission pack
Final report, signed by the red-team lead, with the regulatory submission pack assembled per framework (when applicable). Findings, evidence, severity ladder, dissents — all included. The red-team lead’s name is on every page.
Engagement shape
/ what you sign up for- 01Findings report — signed, with severity ladder 1–3
- 02Patch playbook by failure mode — actionable, with rerun criteria
- 03Regulatory submission pack — per framework, when applicable
- 04Independence attestation — structurally enforced, recorded in your engagement contract
Mappings
/ 6 frameworksEvidence
/ forthcomingThe proof for this pillar gets linked here as we ship public scorecards and clear case studies for publication. We don’t backfill this section with placeholders — when evidence lands, it lands here.
Why independence is enforced contractually
The standard objection to independent assessment is the same one accountancy faced thirty years ago: the firm doing the review is also the firm doing the build. We refuse that shape. On every engagement, the red-team lead and the build lead are different people, named in your contract. Both are subject to revenue caps the contract spells out.
This is in writing because we won’t sell anything we wouldn’t sign our name to in a regulator’s submission.
Where we draw the line
We turn down red-team work that we can’t ship a report for. If a client wants a confidential review we can’t sign and publish a redacted version of, we refuse. The signed report is the product. Without it, what we’d be selling is a private opinion — and we don’t sell those.